Port and Terminal Management Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Port and Terminal Management. Answer: Introduction There are four major port management models that are used in the world namely; landlord port, public service port, private service port and tool port. In the landlord port, the port waters, land, channel and infrastructure are owned by the state. There are opportunities for private firms to rent the port lands (Wang, 2014). The private organizations in Singapore rent the port land to build warehouses that are used to store cargo. The major advantage of landlord port is that the state can utilize resources by balancing their investment. Through the balance of investments, the returns on investments increase (Cimpeanu, 2017). The demerit of this management model is that support services are restricted. Just like in the landlord port, in the public service port, the government has ownership of all the port land, channel, water, and infrastructure. However, in the public service port, the infrastructure in the port is built by the government. The company running the port is state owned. There is a shortcoming with the public service port in that innovation is not encouraged since the private investors are discouraged. The completive advantage of the Port of Singapore in the South East Asia When carriers are making a choice on which ports to use, there are several factors that should be considered (Cimpeanu, Devine, OBrien, 2016). These factors include; the service quality, efficiency of the port, costs, industrial relations that are made by the other businesses and the government, the availability of facilities used in the port and the ease of accessing modes of transport. A comparison between the ports of Singapore and ports in South Asia such as Tanjung Pelepas can be made to bring out the differences that form grounds for competition. The comparison indicates that both the port of Singapore and Port of Tanjung Pelepas offer quality services. Their customer service systems are advanced in that documentation can be handled electronically as stated by Graham (2013). Also, there is guaranteed security for cargo and containers that are stored in the port. The efficiency in the port of Singapore is improved compared to ports in South Asia. In the private service port, the Singapore State permits the investors to carry out their activities freely in the port as long as they work within the jurisdictions of the port operations. For instance, the private and government organizations are allowed to rent the port facilities, an aspect that promote both public and private participation in ensuring the port services meet the required operation standards (Graham, 2013). There are support services initiated by both private and state-owned organizations which include; towing and pilot. Since the government has no direct influence on private service ports, the development of port is flexible and much profitable despite the stiff competition the port of Singapore is facing with other ports such as the Port of Klang and South East Asia in the South East Asian containerbusiness. Some ports like the Port of Tanjung Pelepas and the port of Malaysia have a great problem with their efficiency and productivity. However, a comparative study shows that the port of Singapore has enough and effective facilities necessary for the port service activities and processes (Zhang, Laurenzano, Mars, Tang, 2014). The transport network in the port of Singapore is much developed than other ports such as those of South Asian ports. It is because Singapore uses a frequency with numerous direct calls meant for specific destinations as eluded by (Merkert, 2015). In fact some years ago the ports of Malaysia were not able to handle their export and import goods. It led to about two-thirds of Malaysian traffic trespassing through Singapore port. The port of Singapore has shown fewer efforts to encourage relations with businesses and the government. On the other hand, there is the remarkable effort made by the port management who have gone ahead to even providing berths. The port of S ingapore also has affordable services since there is a corresponding reduced cost of operation, land, and labor. With these remarks, Singapore though limited in some factors stands a better position than other ports in South Asia (Hidalgo, 2017). The container ports face several challenges that range from security problems to inadequate airport facilities. These challenges may either be operational or in the management. The port is known to be affected by different forms of pollution and especially air pollution due to the emission of the gas carbon dioxide (Wang, 2014). This problem has proved hard to be managed. However, the strategies adopted by the management in managing these challenges make the Port of Singapore more competitive.For instance, Wong (2016) denotes that the port management ensures the staff is trained to understand essential management components and policies such as environmental conservation, fuel policy, cargo and container hazards, and inflation among other factors that directly or indirectly affect port operation processes. Conclusion Singapore is also considered a top-class world city to live, play, and work. It is globally connected, cosmopolitan, and multi-cultural city-state that offers a conducive environment to create or promote knowledge-driven industry. As a result, the Port of Singapore has managed to attune to a high level of performance though port business protection, innovation, and intervention. With the city leading as the top provider of different services such as trade and finance, treasury operations, insurance, maritime and finance, and wealth and asset management, among other competitive advantages. The city is as well known for quality, productivity, enforcement of policy rights, integrity, and reliability. Singapore is also known to be the least corrupt nation in Asia. These advantages make it easy for investors to focus on business within the ports of the republic, an aspect that has promoted the growth and establishment of the Port of Singapore. References Cimpeanu, R., Devine, M. T., OBrien, C. (2017). A simulation model for the management and expansion of Singapore extended port terminal operations.Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,98, 105-131. Storage and Logistics. (2010).Chemical Week,172(7), s25-s29. Wong, S. C. (2016). Transformation of Employment Patterns and Need for Career Services in Modern Singapore.Career Development Quarterly,64(3), 287-299. Graham, A. (2013).Managing Airports 4th edition: An international perspective. Routledge Hidalgo, P. (2017). Game theory and port economics: a survey of recent research.Journal of Economic Surveys,31(3), 854-877. Merkert, R., Assaf, A. G. (2015).Using DEA models to jointly estimate service quality perception and profitabilityEvidence from international airports.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,75, 42-50. Wang, (2014). Traffic consolidation in East Asian container ports: a network flow analysis.Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice,61, 152-163. Zhang, Y., Laurenzano, M. A., Mars, J., Tang, L. (2014, December). Smite: Precise qos prediction on real-system smt processors to improve utilization in warehouse scale computers. InProceedings of the 47th Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture(pp. 406-418). IEEE Computer Society.